Moakley v. Eastwick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
666 N.E.2d 505 (1996)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In 1971, John Moakley (plaintiff) created a wall-sized ceramic-tile mural for a church. The mural depicted the history of the Town of East Bridgewater. In 1989, Grace Bible Church Fellowship, Inc. purchased the church. Grace and its pastor, Maurice Eastwick (defendants), found parts of the mural to be religiously objectionable and wished to take down the mural. Due to the size and nature of the mural, it could not be removed without destroying it. Grace began removal of the mural, at which point Moakley was informed and brought suit seeking a permanent injunction. Moakley’s suit was based on the Art Preservation Act, a state law that sought to protect works of art and their connections to their artists. The act prohibited alteration or destruction of a work for the lifetime of the artist plus 50 years. The act went into effect in 1985. The trial court found that the act violated Grace’s constitutional rights. Moakley appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greaney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.