Modderklip East Squatters v. Modderklip Boerdery (Pty) Ltd.
South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
(187/03, 213/03) (2004) ZASCA 47; (2004) 3 All SA 169 (SCA) (2004)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Modderklip Boerdery (Pty) Ltd. (Modderklip) (plaintiff) owned a portion of the farm Modder East. The Modder East farm was adjacent to Daveyton Township. In the 1990s, residents of Daveyton began settling on a strip of land near the farm called the Chris Hani informal settlement. In May 2000, the Chris Hani settlement evicted approximately 400 people, and these 400 people moved onto a portion of the Modder East farm. In October 2000, Modderklip filed an application for eviction of the 2,000 people now squatting on the farm. The squatters opposed the application in court, but the court granted the application for eviction. After the court granted the application, the squatters failed to either vacate the farm or note an appeal to the court’s orders. Modderklip received a writ of execution to evict the squatters, but the sheriff requested a significant amount of money before executing the writ. Modderklip then started filing charges of trespass, but the local prison informed Modderklip that it was unable to hold all the squatters. After the South African Police Services (SAPS) (defendant) and the Ministry for Safety and Security refused to intervene to enforce evictions, Modderklip sought help from the central government to evict the squatters. The president, Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs, and Department of Housing refused to intervene, causing Modderklip to seek a declaratory order to enforce the eviction order under the South African Bill of Rights. The SAPS opposed the declaratory order, arguing that Modderklip needed to pay for the enforcement of the eviction order. The Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs (defendant) also opposed the declaratory order, arguing that the eviction would too greatly impact the public authorities because the squatters would require resettlement. However, the Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs also argued that the resettlement of the squatters was not a responsibility of the central government.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harms, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.