Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Model Vending v. Stanisci

180 A.2d 393 (1962)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Model Vending v. Stanisci

New Jersey Superior Court

180 A.2d 393 (1962)

Facts

Stanisci (defendant) owned a bowling alley. On August 15, 1958, Stanisci signed a contract with Model Vending (Model) (plaintiff), under which Stanisci would operate some of Model’s vending machines in the bowling alley for five years. Under the contract, Model had an exclusive right to merchandise sales at the bowling alley. On about July 28, 1959, Stanisci shut down the vending machines and began selling merchandise at the bowling alley by other means. On March 24, 1961, a fire destroyed the bowling alley. Model sued Stanisci for breach of contract, seeking lost profits from the date Stanisci shut down the machines through August 15, 1963, the end of the contract term. Stanisci argued that performance was impossible after the fire, limiting Model’s damages to the date of the fire. The trial court awarded Model damages of $2,507.27, accounting for lost profits from the date of the breach until the date of the fire. Model appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rizzi, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership