Moen v. Thomas

627 N.W.2d 146 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Moen v. Thomas

North Dakota Supreme Court
627 N.W.2d 146 (2001)

Facts

Laurie and Jerry Thomas (defendants) lived and worked on a ranch owned by Jerry’s father. When Jerry’s father died, Jerry inherited part of the ranch and an option to lease the rest of the ranch from the other members of the family. Jerry told the other family members that he intended to lease the land and paid one year of rent up front. At the end of that year, the other family members put the leased ranch land into a trust, with Carol Moen and others operating as trustees (plaintiffs). The trustees offered Jerry a written seven-year lease. However, Jerry told them he did not want to commit for that long and wanted only a year-to-year lease. Jerry again paid one year of rent up front. However, Jerry died in a ranching accident several months later. At the end of that year’s lease, Laurie asked the trustees to let her lease the property. The trustees declined, but Laurie would not vacate the property. The trustees sued for possession of the land and monetary damages. Laurie brought several counterclaims, including a claim that the seven-year-lease option was still valid and that she could exercise it. At trial, the trustees testified that Jerry had verbally declined the seven-year-lease option and agreed to only a one-year lease. The trial court found for the trustees, ordering Laurie to vacate the land and to pay the trust $19,000 for her unauthorized use. Laurie appealed, arguing that Jerry’s statement to the trustees declining the seven-year-lease option was hearsay and should have been excluded.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neumann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership