Moleculon Research Corp. v. CBS, Inc.

793 F.2d 1261 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Moleculon Research Corp. v. CBS, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
793 F.2d 1261 (1986)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Play video

Facts

Larry Nichols had the idea to create a square puzzle capable of rotational movement. Between 1957 and 1962, Nichols made these puzzles out of paper and showed his friends at school. In 1962 Nichols started working for Moleculon Research Corp. (Moleculon) (plaintiff). In 1968 Nichols made a wood prototype of the puzzle. One day at work, the president of Moleculon saw the wood prototype and expressed interest in selling it. In 1969 Nichols assigned his rights in the invention to Moleculon in exchange for a portion of the proceeds if the puzzle was sold. In 1970 Nichols filed a patent application for his invention on behalf of Moleculon, and Moleculon’s patent was issued in 1972. When Moleculon discovered that CBS, Inc. (defendant) sold a similar puzzle called a Rubik’s Cube, Moleculon sued CBS for patent infringement. CBS argued that Moleculon’s patent was invalid for being in public use and on sale before the patent application was filed. The district court held in favor of Moleculon on this issue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baldwin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership