Molinas v. National Basketball Association

190 F.Supp 241 (1961)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Molinas v. National Basketball Association

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
190 F.Supp 241 (1961)

Facts

Jack Molinas (plaintiff) was drafted by the National Basketball Association’s (NBA) (defendant) Fort Wayne Pistons, which later moved to Detroit. After signing a contract and beginning to play for the team, Molinas admitted that he had regularly bet on the Pistons to win games and profited around $400. When NBA Commissioner Maurice Podoloff learned of Molinas’ betting, he suspended Monlinas indefinitely for violating Section 79 of the league’s constitution and Clause 15 of his contract—both of which prohibited gambling. During subsequent years, Molinas requested to be reinstated on several occasions. Podoloff denied Molinas’ requests saying that he was such a “cancer to the league” that he must never be allowed to re-enter it. In the meantime, Molinas attended, and graduated from, Brooklyn Law School and was admitted to the New York State Bar. Molinas then filed suit against the NBA in the U.S. District Court for enacting and enforcing a rule which constituted an “unreasonable” restraint of trade in Molinas’ services in violation of antitrust laws.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 779,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership