Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.

628 S.E.2d 330 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.

Virginia Supreme Court
628 S.E.2d 330 (2006)

Facts

Lawrence Monahan (plaintiff) did not feel well and sought a medical evaluation from Wakefield Medical Center (Wakefield) (defendant), a doctor’s office owned by Obici Medical Management Services, Inc. (Obici) (defendant). Carrie Wiggins, a physician’s assistant, determined that Monahan’s blood pressure was 200 over 95 and diagnosed him as having a hypertensive crisis. Wiggins initially told Monahan to go to the emergency room. However, after Monahan told Wiggins he would rather wait for his wife to take him home, Wiggins gave him the option to either go to the emergency room or wait for his wife. Monahan chose to wait for his wife, who took him home. Monahan’s condition later worsened, and his wife took him to the hospital, where he was diagnosed as having suffered a stroke. Monahan sued, seeking $1.6 million in damages because Wakefield had failed to diagnose his stroke. The trial judge, at Obici’s request, instructed the jury that Monahan had a duty to minimize his damages and that he should not recover damages caused by failing to exercise this duty. The jury found for Monahan but awarded only $215,000 in damages. Monahan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Agee, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership