Monell v. Department of Social Services

436 U.S. 658 (1978)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Monell v. Department of Social Services

United States Supreme Court
436 U.S. 658 (1978)

Play video

Facts

In 1971, Monell was part of a class of female employees of the Department of Social Services and the Board of Education of New York City who brought a § 1983 action against the department, the board, the city and individual officials of each entity. The complaint alleged that the department and the board, as a matter of official policy, forced pregnant employees to take unpaid leaves of absences prior to any necessary medical leave. The complaint sought injunctive relief and back pay. On cross summary judgment motions, the District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled the practice unconstitutional, but held the claim for injunction moot, because the entities corrected their policies prior to the court decision. The trial court denied back pay, however, because it concluded the pay would come from the city, which enjoys sovereign immunity pursuant to Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961). The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

Concurrence (Powell, J.)

Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership