Monesgasque de Reassurances S.A.M. (Monde Re) v. Nak Naftogaz of Ukraine
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
158 F. Supp. 2d 377 (2001)
- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
In 1998 the Russian company AO Gazprom (Gazprom) entered into a contract with a Ukrainian company that would eventually become part of Ukraine-based Nak Naftogaz of Ukraine (Naftogaz) (defendant), whereby Naftogaz agreed to transport natural gas through Ukraine and deliver the gas to foreign countries on behalf of Gazprom. In exchange, Gazprom agreed to deliver 235 million cubic meters of natural gas to Naftogaz. The next year, Gazprom accused Naftogaz of impermissibly withdrawing 1.48 billion cubic meters of natural gas. Gazprom submitted a claim to its insurer, which had reinsured the risk with Monesgasque de Reassurances S.A.M. (Monde Re) (plaintiff). Monde Re paid the claim and assumed the rights of Gazprom. Pursuant to the contract, Monde Re and Naftogaz arbitrated the dispute before the International Commercial Court of Arbitration in Moscow, and Naftogaz was ordered to pay $88,374,401.49 to Monde Re. Naftogaz failed to pay the award, and Monde Re filed suit in federal district court against both Naftogaz and the government of Ukraine for confirmation of the arbitral award and for entry of judgment. Naftogaz and Ukraine moved to dismiss the suit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marrero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.