Anchor Hocking Corp. (Anchor) (defendant) agreed in principle to become the sole U.S. distributor for Monetti S.P.A. (Monetti) (plaintiff) food service products for ten years. Monetti sent Anchor a draft agreement. Anchor did not sign the draft agreement, but an Anchor employee drafted a memo that incorporated all of the terms in Monetti’s draft agreement and added additional terms that Anchor wanted. The employee initialed the memo. Monetti, as was required in its draft agreement, gave Anchor all of the assets of Melform, a Monetti subsidiary, which had previously distributed Monetti’s food service products. In addition, there was a second Anchor memo, an internal memo on Anchor letterhead that included in “Exhibit A” all terms of the draft agreement except one. Davis, the drafter of this memo referred to it as the “summary agreement” with Monetti. Not long after Anchor wrote this second memo, Monetti brought suit for breach of contract. Anchor argued that the statute of frauds precluded the lawsuit because the agreement was not to be performed within one year and was not in writing. The trial court held that the suit was barred by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) statute of frauds. Monetti appealed.