Monk v. Shulkin

855 F.3d 1312 (2017)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Monk v. Shulkin

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
855 F.3d 1312 (2017)

Facts

In 2012, Conley F. Monk, Jr. (plaintiff) filed a claim for service-connected disability with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) for post-traumatic stress disorder, diabetes, hypertension, and strokes. The VA denied Monk’s claim on the grounds that Monk’s discharge had been other than honorable. Monk filed a notice of disagreement (NOD) and applied to the Board of Corrections of Naval Records (BCNR), requesting an upgrade to Monk’s discharge status. The VA notified Monk that it could not process Monk’s appeal until it received records from the BCNR. In 2015, Monk petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) for a writ of mandamus ordering the VA to promptly adjudicate Monk’s claim as well as the claims of other similarly situated veterans. Monk asked the Veterans Court to certify a class for a class-action suit of veterans at any stage of the disability-claim process who had filed an NOD after having a disability claim denied, had then not received a decision within 12 months, and who could demonstrate financial or medical hardship pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7107(a)(2)(B)–(C). The Veterans Court rejected Monk’s request on the ground that the court lacked the authority to certify a class for a class-action suit. Monk appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reyna, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership