Monroe v. Pape
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 167 (1961)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Early one morning, without a warrant, Frank Pape and 12 other police officers (defendants) burst into the home of James Monroe (plaintiff). The officers made Monroe and his family stand naked while the officers ransacked the home. Monroe was then taken to a police station. Monroe was detained and interrogated for 10 hours without being given access to an attorney. No charges were ever filed against Monroe. Monroe sued the City of Chicago (defendant) and the officers in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they had violated Monroe’s constitutional rights. The city and officers moved to dismiss the federal lawsuit, arguing that (1) § 1983 applied only to federal officials; (2) the officers were not acting under color of state law, because state law formally prohibited their alleged actions; and (3) Monroe should first seek relief in state court. The district court dismissed Monroe’s complaint. The Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Concurrence (Harlan, J.)
Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
