Monsanto Company v. McFarling

488 F.3d 973 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Monsanto Company v. McFarling

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
488 F.3d 973 (2007)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Monsanto Company (Monsanto) (plaintiff) developed a patented system of weed control that consisted of genetically modified soybean crops that were resistant to a specified herbicide. The crop seeds were sold under the trade name Roundup Ready and protected by patents. Monsanto authorized certain distributors to sell Roundup Ready. Farmers who purchased the product were required to sign a technology agreement that gave them a license to use the seeds on the condition that the farmer could not save seeds from the purchased seeds and replant saved seeds. In this way, farmers had to repurchase seeds every year, and one bag of seed was sufficient to plant one acre of farmland. The cost of a license was $6.50 per bag of seeds, and the cost of seeds was $19 to $22 per bag. In 1998, Homan McFarling (defendant) purchased Roundup Ready seeds from an authorized distributor, signed the technology agreement, and paid the license fee. McFarling then violated the technology agreement in 1999 and 2000 by saving seeds from his soybean crops and replanting them. The saved seeds had the genetic traits of Monsanto’s patented seeds. Monsanto sued McFarling for breach of the technology agreement and patent infringement. The court found in favor of Monsanto. After various court proceedings and appeals, a jury trial was held on the issue of damages. The jury heard evidence on license fees, the benefits to Monsanto from maintaining its licensing program, and the benefits to farmers from using Roundup Ready seeds. Benefits included an increased yield of soybean crops and lower weed-control costs compared to ordinary, nonmodified soybean seeds. An average farmer saved $31 to $61 per acre through an increased yield of soybeans and lower weed-control costs. The jury returned a damages verdict of $40 per bag of seeds, and based on the finding, Monsanto was awarded approximately $375,000 in damages. McFarling appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership