Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana
Montana Supreme Court
2016 MT 44, 382 Mont. 256, 368 P.3d 1131 (2016)
- Written by Patrick Speice, JD
Facts
In 2011, Montana (defendant) passed a new medical-marijuana law that authorized patients to use medical marijuana to treat illnesses, despite the existence of federal laws prohibiting such conduct and the federal government’s stated intention to enforce those laws when doing so is in the federal government’s interest. Montana’s medical-marijuana law included restrictions intended to prevent the emergence of a large-scale commercial medical-marijuana industry in Montana. Namely, the medical-marijuana law prohibited medical-marijuana providers from treating more than three patients and accepting compensation for providing medical marijuana or related services to patients. The Montana Cannabis Industry Association (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in state court seeking to enjoin the enforcement of the three-patient and compensation restrictions on the basis that both restrictions violated the due process and equal protection clauses of Montana’s state constitution. The court found both restrictions unconstitutional and granted a permanent injunction barring Montana from enforcing either restriction. Montana appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)
Dissent (Rice, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.