Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana

2016 MT 44, 382 Mont. 256, 368 P.3d 1131 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. Montana

Montana Supreme Court
2016 MT 44, 382 Mont. 256, 368 P.3d 1131 (2016)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

In 2011, Montana (defendant) passed a new medical-marijuana law that authorized patients to use medical marijuana to treat illnesses, despite the existence of federal laws prohibiting such conduct and the federal government’s stated intention to enforce those laws when doing so is in the federal government’s interest. Montana’s medical-marijuana law included restrictions intended to prevent the emergence of a large-scale commercial medical-marijuana industry in Montana. Namely, the medical-marijuana law prohibited medical-marijuana providers from treating more than three patients and accepting compensation for providing medical marijuana or related services to patients. The Montana Cannabis Industry Association (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in state court seeking to enjoin the enforcement of the three-patient and compensation restrictions on the basis that both restrictions violated the due process and equal protection clauses of Montana’s state constitution. The court found both restrictions unconstitutional and granted a permanent injunction barring Montana from enforcing either restriction. Montana appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)

Dissent (Rice, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership