Montana Reservoir Irrigation Co. v. Utah Junk Co.
Utah Supreme Court
228 P. 201 (1924)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Montana Power Company occasionally sold scrap metal to Utah Junk Company (defendant). A man named Aaron Rosenblatt handled these transactions on Utah Junk’s behalf. The same individuals served as officers of Montana Power and its subsidiary, Montana Reservoir Irrigation Company (Montana Reservoir) (plaintiff). Thus, even though Montana Reservoir itself had never done business with Utah Junk, Montana Reservoir’s officers were aware of the principal-agent relationship between Utah Junk and Rosenblatt. Utah Junk did not notify its suppliers when it terminated its relationship with Rosenblatt. Subsequently, Montana Reservoir sold scrap metal to Rosenblatt in the belief that he still represented Utah Junk. When Utah Junk refused payment, Montana Reservoir sued. Utah Junk appealed the trial court’s judgment for Montana Reservoir to the Utah Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gideon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.