Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians

471 U.S. 759, 105 S.Ct. 2399, 85 L.Ed.2d 753 (1985)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...

Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians

United States Supreme Court

471 U.S. 759, 105 S.Ct. 2399, 85 L.Ed.2d 753 (1985)

Facts

A 1924 act permitted Indian tribes to lease mineral rights on their reservation land. The 1924 act explicitly permitted states to tax royalty payments the tribes received under those leases. In 1938, Congress passed the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938. The 1938 act did not explicitly permit state taxation of royalty payments, nor did it explicitly repeal the provision of the 1924 act permitting such taxation. However, the 1938 act contained a general clause repealing all prior laws inconsistent with the 1938 act. The Blackfeet Tribe of Indians (the tribe) (defendants) leased oil and gas rights on reservation land to non-Indians. The state of Montana (plaintiff) sought to tax the tribe’s royalty payments under those leases.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership