Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians

471 U.S. 759, 105 S.Ct. 2399, 85 L.Ed.2d 753 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians

United States Supreme Court
471 U.S. 759, 105 S.Ct. 2399, 85 L.Ed.2d 753 (1985)

Facts

A 1924 act permitted Indian tribes to lease mineral rights on their reservation land. The 1924 act explicitly permitted states to tax royalty payments the tribes received under those leases. In 1938, Congress passed the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938. The 1938 act did not explicitly permit state taxation of royalty payments, nor did it explicitly repeal the provision of the 1924 act permitting such taxation. However, the 1938 act contained a general clause repealing all prior laws inconsistent with the 1938 act. The Blackfeet Tribe of Indians (the tribe) (defendants) leased oil and gas rights on reservation land to non-Indians. The state of Montana (plaintiff) sought to tax the tribe’s royalty payments under those leases.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership