Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Montana Wilderness Association v. United States Forest Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
655 F.2d 951 (1981)


Facts

Burlington Northern, Inc. (Burlington Northern) (defendant), owned land containing timber in Montana. This land was surrounded by national-forest land and had originally been acquired by the Northern Pacific Railroad pursuant to a federal grant of odd-numbered square sections of land in exchange for the construction of railroad tracks. The federal government retained the even-numbered parcels of land, which formed a checkerboard pattern in the area. Burlington Northern planned to construct an access road through the national-forest land and received a permit from the United States Forest Service (defendant) to do so. A neighboring property owner and a group of environmentalists (plaintiffs) sued Burlington Northern and the United States Forest Service to prevent construction of the road. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the judgment of the trial court. The defendants moved the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reconsider based on new legislative history.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Norris, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.