Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W.L. Bangham, Inc.

49 Cal. 3d 454, 777 P.2d 623, 261 Cal. Rptr. 587 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W.L. Bangham, Inc.

California Supreme Court
49 Cal. 3d 454, 777 P.2d 623, 261 Cal. Rptr. 587 (1989)

Facts

W.L. Bangham, Inc. (Bangham) (defendant) performed $44,310 worth of work on property owned by Oak Knoll Partnership (Oak Knoll). Oak Knoll failed to pay for the work, and Bangham recorded a mechanic’s lien against the property. The primary lien position was occupied by a deed of trust that, at the time Bangham filed its mechanic’s lien, had 252 beneficiaries and named Western Mutual Corporation (Western) as trustee. Bangham filed suit to foreclose on the mechanic’s lien, naming both Western and the beneficiaries as defendants. Bangham served Western with summons and complaint but did not serve the beneficiaries. In the meantime, Oak Knoll had defaulted on the loan secured by the deed of trust, and one day after Western was served with Bangham’s summons and complaint, Western conducted a trustee’s sale at which the beneficiaries purchased the property. Monterey S.P. Partnership (Monterey) (plaintiff) later acquired title to the property by a quitclaim deed. Bangham subsequently received a default judgment against Western in the mechanic’s-lien lawsuit. Pursuant to the default judgment, the property was sold at a sheriff’s sale, and Bangham bought the property. Monterey sued Bangham for a judgment quieting title to the property and declaring that the sheriff’s deed did not affect Monterey’s interest. The trial court granted Monterey’s motion for summary judgment. The court of appeal reversed, holding that California law allowed Bangham to foreclose on the mechanic’s lien against Western without joining the beneficiaries. Monterey appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lucas, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership