Montgomery Health Care Facility, Inc. v. Ballard

565 So. 2d 221 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Montgomery Health Care Facility, Inc. v. Ballard

Alabama Supreme Court
565 So. 2d 221 (1990)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Edna Stovall was a patient at Montgomery Health Care Facility, Inc. (Montgomery Health) (defendant), a nursing home owned and operated by First American Health Care, Inc. (First American) (defendant). First American exercised daily control over Montgomery Health’s operations. Stovall was admitted to Montgomery Health in February 1985, suffering from several serious health conditions. Stovall did not have any bedsores upon admission. Bedsores are pressure sores caused by the compression of tissue between bones and supportive surfaces, like beds. Pressure sores start at the skin level but can reach into the muscles and become fatally infected. Bedsores are prevented by regularly monitoring, turning, and exercising the patient. Bedsores are treated with sterile wound care and by keeping the patient clean. Stovall developed her first bedsore a week after admission to Montgomery Health. Over the next year, Stovall required multiple surgical interventions to treat seriously infected bedsores. Stovall ultimately died from complications related to the infected bedsores. Ella Ballard (plaintiff), the administrator of Stovall’s estate, sued Montgomery Health and First American for negligence, arguing that their neglect proximately caused Stovall’s death. At trial, Stovall’s children testified that Montgomery Health neglected Stovall’s personal hygiene, failed to properly clean and treat Stovall’s bedsores, and failed to regularly turn and exercise Stovall. The trial court admitted into evidence complaint reports submitted to the Alabama Department of Public Health (DPH) stating that Montgomery Health was understaffed, that numerous patients suffered from dangerously infected bedsores, that patients were not monitored or exercised properly, and that staff members lacked training in infection management. The jury awarded Ballard $2 million in damages. Montgomery Health and First American appealed, arguing that (1) the DPH complaint reports were inadmissible; and (2) First American was not liable for Montgomery Health’s negligence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shores, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership