Montrose Chemical Corp. of California v. Admiral Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
10 Cal. 4th 645, 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 324, 913 P.2d 878 (1995)
- Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Facts
Admiral Insurance Company (defendant) issued four comprehensive-general-liability (CGL) policies to Montrose Chemical Corporation of California (plaintiff). Montrose sought defense and indemnification from Admiral for third-party claims for injuries and property damage that manifested during Montrose’s coverage periods but had resulted from its pre-coverage hazardous-waste disposal. Admiral disputed whether the third-party claims were covered under Montrose’s policies and refused to defend Montrose against any third-party lawsuits or indemnify Montrose for any of its losses. Montrose sued Admiral for breach of the insurance contracts, and a state trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Admiral. Montrose appealed, and the appellate court reversed. The California Supreme Court granted review and considered several issues, including whether ambiguities in the insurance contracts should be resolved against Admiral.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lucas, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.