Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.

649 F.3d 975 (2011) (en banc)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
649 F.3d 975 (2011) (en banc)

SH

Facts

Larry Montz (plaintiff) conceived of an idea for a television show that would follow a team of paranormal investigators to different real-world locations, where the team would use various devices to investigate reports of paranormal activities. Montz pitched the idea to television studios and producers, including representatives of NBC Universal, Inc. (defendant), and presented materials related to the concept throughout the process. NBC indicated it was not interested but later partnered with Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc. (defendant) to produce a series based on Montz’s idea and materials, which was ultimately called Ghost Hunters. Montz filed suit against NBC and Pilgrim for breach of implied contract and breach of confidence, among other causes of action. Montz’s complaint specifically alleged that he presented the idea on the express condition that he would receive a share of the profits derived from any use of his idea. The district court found Montz’s state-law claims to be preempted by the federal copyright laws and dismissed both claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schroeder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership