Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • M
  • Moody v. Blanchard Place ApartmentsMoody v. Blanchard Place Apartments
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Moody v. Blanchard Place Apartments

Louisiana Court of Appeal
793 So.2d 281 (2001)


Robert Moody (plaintiff) was cooking on the stove in an apartment he rented from Blanchard Place Apartments (Blanchard Place) (defendant) when a metal spoon came into contact with the stove and he suffered a serious electric shock. The strength of the current was so strong that it prevented Moody from immediately drawing away from the stove. When he finally did, Moody stumbled backwards and hit his head, neck, and back on the opposite kitchen wall. Moody’s two daughters, Leah Nicole and Lacy Brook (plaintiffs), witnessed the incident. Moody filed suit individually, and on behalf of his daughters, against Blanchard Place, its manager, Calhoun Property Management, Inc. (defendant), and their insurance carrier, Clarendon National Insurance Company (defendant). At trial, testimony was provided by both sides regarding the appropriate amount to be awarded for Moody’s lost past and future wages. Dr. Luvonia Casperson, an economist testifying for Moody, calculated Moody’s lost past wages to be $60,283 and lost fringe benefits to be $7,234. Further, Dr. Casperson estimated Moody’s lost future earnings to be $300,974. Using a different formula, Dr. Kenneth Boudreaux, an economist testifying for defendants, calculated Moody’s lost past wages to be $35,242 and lost future wages to be $27,012. After trial, the jury held for plaintiffs and awarded substantial damages to Moody and his daughters. A portion of the award included special damages in the amount of $60,000 for Moody’s lost past wages and $100,000 for his loss of future earnings. All parties appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Peatross, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial