Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 411 (1958)


Facts

This case considers two consolidated cases. In the first, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) found Moog Industries, Inc. (Moog) (plaintiff) to have violated the Clayton Act and ordered it to cease and desist. Moog sought review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The Eighth Circuit affirmed, and Moog moved for a hold on the order on grounds that it would suffer financial loss if it was prohibited from engaging in pricing practices that were still open to its competitors. In the second case, C.E. Neihoff & Co. (Neihoff) (plaintiff) was also found to have engaged in violations of the Clayton Act. Neihoff requested that the FTC hold in abeyance the cease and desist order on the ground that it would also suffer serious financial loss if it could not engage in the same pricing practices as its competitors. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the order, but ordered it held in abeyance. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the split in the circuits.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.