Moore v. Circosta

141 S. Ct. 46 (2020)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Moore v. Circosta

United States Supreme Court
141 S. Ct. 46 (2020)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

In the summer of 2020, in response the COVID-19 pandemic, the North Carolina General Assembly adopted new election laws for the upcoming November 2020 election. The new laws, in relevant part, increased access to absentee ballots but retained the existing absentee-ballot submission deadline, which required all absentee ballots to be received by November 6, three days after the November 3 election. Subsequently, the State Board of Elections, led by Damon Circosta (collectively, BOE) (defendants) issued a rule extending the absentee-ballot submission deadline by an additional six days (the deadline-extension rule), meaning that the deadline was extended from November 6 to November 12. North Carolina Republican State Representative Thomas Moore (plaintiff) challenged the BOE’s rule, arguing that the BOE had no authority to extend the absentee-ballot submission deadline. The district court and the Fourth Circuit both upheld the BOE’s deadline-extension rule. Moore appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Dissent (Gorsuch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership