Moore v. Moore
Kansas Court of Appeals
429 P. 3d 607, 50 Kan. App. 2d 301 (2018)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Elderly and sick married couple John and Joyce Moore (plaintiff) were parents to four children. John and Joyce owned a farm and homestead and had created a trust (plaintiff) and estate plan to benefit all their children. Joyce contended that their son Steven (defendant) beset John on his deathbed while Joyce was hospitalized for a severe abdominal infection and pressured the couple to sign two contracts to sell their farmland to Steven’s son Jebediah (plaintiff) at below-market prices with nominal interest and lengthy payment terms to the disadvantage of Steven’s siblings and contrary to John and Joyce’s plan. Evidence showed that Steven repeatedly warned Joyce that her other children would sell the land and destroy the family farm and that Steven failed to inform his siblings of the land sales that affected their trust interests. After John died, Joyce and the trust sued Steven and Jebediah for undue influence. Steven was the only sibling to farm and live on the land. Some years earlier, Joyce and John had signed powers of attorney for their financial affairs and medical directives, naming Steven as the successor to whichever of them died first. After a jury trial, the jury returned verdicts in favor of Steven and Jebediah, but the jury had been incorrectly instructed that the plaintiff bore the burden of proof to establish undue influence. Joyce and the trust appealed and argued this was reversible error.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Atcheson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.