Moore v. Regents of the University of California
Supreme Court of California
793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990)
John Moore (plaintiff) underwent treatment for leukemia at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center. There, Dr. David Golde (defendant) recommended removal of Moore’s spleen. Golde then used Moore’s cells for research without Moore’s permission. Golde established a patented cell line, which he licensed for commercial development. The patent was held by the Regents of the University of California (Regents) (defendant), and listed as inventors Golde and UCLA researcher Shirley Quan (defendant). The defendants made a significant amount of money from the cell line. Moore filed a thirteen-count lawsuit. Specifically, Moore sued for lack of informed consent and breach of fiduciary duty, due to the defendants’ omission of their financial interests in Moore’s cells. Moore also sued for conversion. The defendants moved for summary judgment, which was granted on the conversion count. The trial court dismissed the rest of the complaint. Moore appealed, and the California Court of Appeal reversed, ordering the trial court to reinstate the conversion claim, allow Moore to amend his inadequate informed consent claim, and rule on the remaining claims. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Panelli, J.)
Concurrence (Arabian, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Broussard, J.)
Dissent (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.