Moore v. United States
United States Supreme Court
429 U.S. 20 (1976)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted John David Moore, Jr. for possession with intent to distribute heroin. Police received a tip from a confidential informant that Moore possessed heroin and kept it in his apartment. After obtaining a search warrant based only on the tip, police raided the apartment, where they found Moore and a woman inside. Moore was lying face down on the floor, and the police found heroin nearby. Aside from the informant’s tip, the search warrant, and police testimony about the tip, there was no evidence that Moore regularly lived in the apartment or actually possessed the heroin. The prosecutor emphasized the content of the informant’s tip in his closing argument, and in rendering his judgment against Moore, the judge expressly accepted that content as true. A court of appeals rejected Moore's appeal of his conviction. On appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Moore argued all the evidence against him relied on inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.