Moores v. Greenberg
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
834 F.2d 1105 (1987)
- Written by Casey Cohen, JD
Facts
Ralph Moores, Jr. (plaintiff) was a longshoreman who was injured on the job and collected worker’s compensation benefits. After Moores collected his benefits, he hired attorney Nathan Greenberg (defendant) and brought a third-party liability suit against the owners of the ship. Moores and Greenberg agreed that Greenberg would be paid a contingency fee of one-third of the amount of any judgment or settlement. Although the case was ongoing, the ship owners offered to settle the case for $70,000 and then later for $90,000. Greenberg did not relay the settlement offers to Moores for consideration. Moores and Greenberg lost the suit against the ship owners. Moores sued Greenberg for malpractice. Moores claimed that he would have accepted the $90,000 settlement offer if Greenberg had presented it to him. Moores won the malpractice suit, and a jury awarded Moores $12,000. Greenberg appealed and contested the court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict. Greenberg argued that the evidence Moores presented was insufficient to support liability.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.