Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Morales v. Portuondo

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
154 F. Supp. 2d 706 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)


Facts

Jose Morales (defendant) and Ruben Montalvo were convicted of the murder of Jose Antonio Rivera in 1998. Rivera had been walking down the street with his family when he was accosted by a group of teenagers with whom he had previously had hostile dealings. The teenagers chased Rivera and beat and stabbed him to death. Morales and Montalvo were convicted of the murder, though they steadfastly maintained their innocence. Shortly after the convictions but before the sentencing, Jesus Fornes, another teenager, confessed that he, not Morales and Montalvo, had committed the murder. Fornes confessed to a priest, Father Joseph Towle, to Montalvo’s mother, to Morales’ attorney, and to a Legal Aid attorney, Stanley Cohen. However, at a later hearing on a motion to set aside the verdict, Fornes refused to testify. Towle refused to testify on grounds of a priest-penitent privilege; Cohen also refused based on the attorney-client privilege; and the statements made to Montalvo’s mother and Morales’s attorney were hearsay. Morales and Montalvo went to prison for the murder. In 1997, Fornes was killed in an unrelated accident. In 2001, Morales filed a habeas corpus petition, and at the hearing, Morales called five witnesses, including Towle and Cohen. Morales contended he was denied due process because he was not permitted to present evidence of Fornes’ statements in his defense.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.