Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Moran v. Burbine

United States Supreme Court
 475 U.S. 412 (1986)


Police arrested Burbine (defendant) for burglary and then realized he was suspected of a murder that happened months earlier. Burbine’s sister called the Public Defender’s Office to get an attorney to represent Burbine on the burglary charge; she was not aware that he was suspected of murder. An attorney called the police station and stated that she would represent Burbine if he was going to be put in a lineup or questioned. The attorney was told by police that Burbine would not be questioned or put in a lineup that evening. The police did not tell the attorney that Burbine was suspected of murder. Burbine never knew that his sister retained an attorney to represent him or that the attorney called the police station. Shortly after the attorney’s phone call, police began interviewing Burbine about the murder. Before each interview, they gave Burbine proper Miranda warnings. Burbine signed three separate written waivers of his Miranda rights and three written statements admitting to the murder. Burbine moved to suppress the written confessions prior to his trial. The court denied his motion to suppress and held that he had knowingly waived his Miranda rights. He was convicted of murder in the first degree. On appeal to the state supreme court, his conviction was affirmed. Burbine petitioned the federal court for a writ of habeas corpus but was denied. On appeal to the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, his conviction was reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.