Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Moran v. Raymond Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
484 F.2d 1008 (1973)


Facts

Central Steel and Wire Company (Central) purchased a forklift with the load-lifter on the side. The forklift was manufactured by Raymond Corporation (Raymond) (defendant). The forklift’s controls were in a cage, essentially a driver’s seat, at one end of the forklift. Juan Moran (plaintiff), as an employee of Central, used the forklift. Moran was trained to operate the controls only when he was in the operator’s cage. Moran was using the forklift to transport trays when some of the trays came loose. To fix the situation, Moran left the operator’s cage and climbed onto the side load-lifter. While on the side load-lifter, Moran found that he needed to lower the lift to straighten the trays. While still on the side load-lifter, Moran reached through a hole in the cage and pulled the lever to lower the lift. Moran testified that he attempted to pull his arm back quickly, but he was unable to remove his arm before the lowering of the lift caused injury. Moran brought a products-liability suit against Raymond based on strict liability. Raymond argued that Moran had assumed the risk. The jury found in favor of Moran. Raymond appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Pell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.