Morehead v. Atkinson-Kiewit, J/V
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
97 F.3d 603 (1996)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Atkinson-Kiewit, J/V (A-K) (defendant) was a joint venture formed to construct a bridge over the Narragansett Bay. To aid in the construction, A-K chartered barges and tugboats to transport materials around the bay to various worksites. Union rules prevented A-K from having the tugs’ crews tie and untie the lines connecting the barges. As a workaround, A-K had its own carpenters work the lines. Mark Morehead (plaintiff) was a carpenter employed by A-K on the project. Morehead and another A-K-employed carpenter were tasked with untying two barges from each other. While attempting to catch a line thrown by his companion, Morehead fell into a hidden open hatch on the deck of one of the barges and suffered injuries. Morehead filed several claims against A-K but agreed to withdraw all but a negligence action pursuant to § 905(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. The district court dismissed Morehead’s claim for negligence. A panel of judges on the court of appeals affirmed. However, a separate panel of the court of appeals issued a legally irreconcilable decision on the same day in a different case based on similar facts. The full court of appeals vacated both opinions and reheard Morehead’s case en banc to arrive at a clear legal rule.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, J.)
Dissent (Cyr, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


