Morgan v. Allison Crane & Rigging LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
114 F.4th 214 (2024)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Andrew Morgan (plaintiff) worked for Allison Crane & Rigging LLC (Crane) (defendant) as an industrial-machinery tradesman. In September 2020, Morgan injured his back while working. Morgan went to a chiropractor, complaining that it hurt to sit, walk, and turn from side to side. The chiropractor diagnosed Morgan with a bulged or herniated disc, recommended twice-weekly treatment, and advised Morgan to switch to light-duty work. In notes to Crane, the chiropractor stated that Morgan should be excused from bending and lifting from October 8 to November 25. Crane complied, placing Morgan on light duty. On November 13, a supervisor reprimanded Morgan for not wearing proper protective gear. On November 17, Morgan turned down an assignment because it conflicted with a chiropractor appointment. Later that day, Morgan rejected an alternate assignment because it involved sitting for an extended period. Morgan claimed that he instead worked in the work yard that day. However, Crane claimed that Morgan did not work that day, and on November 18, it terminated him for failure to follow the time-off-request procedure and other policies. Morgan sued Crane, alleging that Crane terminated him because of his injury and that doing so constituted disability discrimination violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The district court concluded that Morgan’s back pain did not constitute a disability because it was minor and not permanent. The court therefore granted summary judgment in Crane’s favor. Morgan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

