Morgan v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Court of Appeals
2019 WL 2896651 (2019)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Kentucky resident Jack Morgan (defendant) hosted cockfighting events on his property in 2016. The Commonwealth of Kentucky (plaintiff) charged Morgan with second-degree cruelty to animals based on Morgan’s cockfighting activities. Morgan moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that cockfighting was not cruelty to animals because birds were exempt from the definition of animals in the Kentucky statute defining the offense. The trial court denied Morgan’s motion to dismiss. A grand jury subsequently indicted Morgan for offenses that included promoting gambling, conspiracy, engaging in organized crime, possession of gambling records, and second-degree cruelty to animals based on Morgan’s involvement in cockfighting. Morgan pleaded guilty to the charges of promoting gambling and cruelty to animals, subject to the condition that Morgan be allowed to appeal whether he had been properly charged with cruelty to animals based on cockfighting. The trial court entered a judgment and sentence against Morgan based on his guilty plea, and Morgan appealed the animal-cruelty issue to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.