Morgan v. Commonwealth of Virginia

328 U.S. 373 (1946)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Morgan v. Commonwealth of Virginia

United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 373 (1946)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Under a Virginia statute, “white and colored passengers” were required to be separately seated on all passenger buses traveling in the state and between states. The number of allocated seats for each race could change at any given time as necessary to maintain the separation. Failing to comply was punishable as a misdemeanor. Irene Morgan (defendant), who was Black, boarded a bus to travel from Virginia to Maryland through Washington, D.C. In Virginia, she refused to move from a seat allocated for white passengers to a seat in the back allocated for colored persons. She was arrested and convicted by the state (plaintiff). At the time, there was no federal law on the issue of racial separation in interstate transportation. Eighteen northern and western states prohibited racial separation on public transportation, while 10 southern states required racial separation. Some states requiring racial separation also defined a means of identifying a person as colored, and the definitions varied. In Virginia, a colored person was someone with any ascertainable Negro blood. Morgan appealed her conviction to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the Virginia statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)

Dissent (Burton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership