Morin Bldg. Prods. Co. v. Baystone Constr., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
717 F.2d 413 (1983)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
General Motors hired Baystone Construction, Inc. (Baystone) (defendant) to build a new addition to its Chevrolet factory in Indiana. Baystone hired Morin Building Products Company (Morin) (plaintiff) to complete the aluminum walls for the addition. Pursuant to the contract, the walls were to be made out of “mill-finish” aluminum; a grade of aluminum characterized by its raw and sometimes uneven appearance. The contract additionally provided that all work was subject to final approval by General Motors’ agent, and that his “decision in matters relating to artistic effect shall be final, if within the terms of the Contract Documents.” Morin successfully completed the walls. However, when viewed from an angle in the sunlight, the walls did not have a uniform appearance. The General Motors agent rejected the walls, and Baystone hired another contractor to replace them. The second walls were accepted, despite still having a slightly uneven appearance when viewed at an angle in the sunlight. Baystone refused to pay Morin for the balance of the contract price ($23,000) and Morin successfully brought suit for the balance. Baystone appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.