Morio v. North American Soccer League
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
501 F. Supp. 633 (1980)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
After the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had certified the North American Soccer League Players Association (NASLPA) to serve as a union for league soccer players (and during a subsequent legal challenge of the NLRB’s determination), the North American Soccer League (NASL) (defendant) refused to bargain collectively with the union. Its clubs continued to negotiate new contracts with individual players, instead of going through the NASLPA. In those contracts, the NASL instituted a number of changes, including extending the season by two weeks, creating a winter soccer season, decreasing team rosters, and designating the footwear players could wear. The NLRB’s General Counsel, Morio (plaintiff), filed suit against the NASL requesting an injunction preventing the league’s negotiating the individual contracts and requesting that all contracts entered after certification of the NASLPA as the union be “voidable.”
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Motley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.