Morris v. Gilmer
United States Supreme Court
129 U.S. 315, 9 S. Ct. 289, 32 L. Ed. 690 (1889)
In 1884 James N. Gilmer (plaintiff), a citizen of Alabama, sued Josiah Morris and F. M. Billing (defendants), also citizens of Alabama, in Alabama state court over a dispute about stock transfers. The state court dismissed the case with prejudice, holding that it was barred by the statute of limitations. Because the case was dismissed with prejudice, Gilmer could not refile the lawsuit in state court. In 1886 Gilmer, claiming to be a citizen of Tennessee, filed a lawsuit against Morris and Billing in federal district court alleging the same state-law violations he had alleged in state court. Gilmer asserted that diversity jurisdiction existed over the lawsuit because diversity of citizenship existed between him and Morris and Billing. Though Gilmer had moved to Tennessee to file the lawsuit, Morris and Billing presented evidence that Gilmer had moved to Tennessee solely to establish citizenship for diversity-jurisdiction purposes and that Gilmer intended to move back to Alabama permanently. Morris and Billing moved to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that diversity of citizenship did not exist in the case because Gilmer lacked the sufficient intent to be considered a Tennessee citizen. The circuit court denied the motion to dismiss and held in favor of Gilmer. Morris and Billing appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.