Morriss v. BNSF Railway Co.

817 F.3d 1104 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Morriss v. BNSF Railway Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
817 F.3d 1104 (2016)

Facts

BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) (defendant) offered Melvin Morriss (plaintiff) a position as a machinist. Because BNSF considered the machinist position to be safety-sensitive, the offer was contingent on a satisfactory medical review. BNSF doctors conducted two physical examinations of Morriss. At one examination, Morriss weighed 285 pounds and had a body mass index (BMI) of 40.9, and at the other, he weighed 281 pounds, which resulted in a BMI of 40.4. Morriss reported that he considered his overall health to be good, and treatment records provided by Morriss’s doctor indicated that he was not suffering from any physical impairment. BNSF, however, had a policy that precluded the hiring of a new applicant for a safety-sensitive position if the applicant’s BMI was equal to or exceeded 40. BNSF revoked Morriss’s employment offer, and Morriss filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Morriss argued, among other things, that BNSF discriminated against him because it regarded his obesity as a disability. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of BNSF, and Morriss appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wollman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership