Morriss v. BNSF Railway Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
817 F.3d 1104 (2016)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) (defendant) offered Melvin Morriss (plaintiff) a position as a machinist. Because BNSF considered the machinist position to be safety-sensitive, the offer was contingent on a satisfactory medical review. BNSF doctors conducted two physical examinations of Morriss. At one examination, Morriss weighed 285 pounds and had a body mass index (BMI) of 40.9, and at the other, he weighed 281 pounds, which resulted in a BMI of 40.4. Morriss reported that he considered his overall health to be good, and treatment records provided by Morriss’s doctor indicated that he was not suffering from any physical impairment. BNSF, however, had a policy that precluded the hiring of a new applicant for a safety-sensitive position if the applicant’s BMI was equal to or exceeded 40. BNSF revoked Morriss’s employment offer, and Morriss filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Morriss argued, among other things, that BNSF discriminated against him because it regarded his obesity as a disability. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of BNSF, and Morriss appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wollman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
