Supreme Court of Minnesota
71 N.W. 682 (1897)
Henry Blood, Jr. left a will that granted his entire estate to his wife, Margaret E. Blood (plaintiff). The estate included several parcels of land. The will prevented Margaret from giving or bequeathing “one cent” of the estate to any of her family members or to any of Henry’s family members. Henry’s heirs (defendants) asserted a right to the estate. Margaret brought an action to determine the defendants’ claims. The defendants’ filed an answer asserting their right to the estate, upon Margaret’s violation of the condition in the will. The lower court sustained an objection to the defendants’ answer. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Canty, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.