Mort v. United States

86 F.3d 890 (1996)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mort v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
86 F.3d 890 (1996)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

A trust borrowed $30,000 from Elwin and Jeanne Kern for a property mortgage. Then the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) filed a lien against the property for taxes the trust owed. To protect their own interest in the property, James and Carol Belmont loaned the trust money for another mortgage to pay off the Kerns’ mortgage and a state-tax lien. The title insurer failed to discover the IRS lien. The Belmonts assigned their interests to Jeffrey and Pamela Mort and others (plaintiffs). After the IRS seized the property, the Morts sued, asking the court to declare their interest superior to the IRS lien under equitable subrogation, meaning the Morts and Kerns held the same priority rights. The trial court dismissed, finding that the Morts could not claim equitable subrogation without first suing the title insurer.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zilly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Remedies

Key Terms