United States Supreme Court
417 U.S. 535 (1974)
The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) was required by the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. § 461, to grant a preference in hiring to American Indians. In 1972, the BIA adopted a policy that also granted a preference to American Indians in promotions. A class of non-Indian BIA employees (plaintiffs) sued the secretary of the interior, the commissioner of Indian affairs, and various BIA directors (defendants), alleging that the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, had repealed the provision of the Indian Reorganization Act that authorized a preference for Indians. The district court ruled that the Indian-preference provision had been implicitly repealed and permanently enjoined the BIA from implementing any policy that would grant a preference to Indians. The defendants appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.