Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
537 U.S. 418 (2003)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Victor and Cathy Moseley (defendants) owned Victor’s Secret, a small retail store engaged in the sale of women’s lingerie. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (V Secret) (plaintiff) is comprised of affiliated corporations that own the Victoria’s Secret trademark. Victoria’s Secret is a large and reputable retail chain also engaged in the sale of women’s lingerie. In February 1998, the Moseleys advertised the grand opening of their store to residents of a military installation. An army colonel saw the ad and was offended by the Moseleys’ use of a name so similar to Victoria’s Secret. He therefore forwarded the ad to V Secret. V Secret’s attorney contacted the Moseleys, stating that the similarity in the names would likely lead to confusion and would dilute the distinctiveness of Victoria Secret’s mark. The attorney requested that the Moseleys discontinue the use of their name. In response, the Moseleys changed the name of their store to Victor’s Little Secret. Dissatisfied with the change, V Secret brought suit in District Court. The District Court ruled in favor of V Secret. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
