Mosher v. Cook United, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
405 N.E.2d 720 (1980)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Hudson Food Warehouse Corporation (defendant) published an advertisement in which it claimed it had lower prices than its competitors and urged shoppers to “check and compare.” In response to this advertisement, Arthur Mosher (plaintiff) went shopping at a Hudson grocery store. Mosher began writing down prices in order to be able to compare Hudson’s prices with those of its competitors. Hudson employees informed Mosher that it was against store policy to write down prices. When Mosher refused to stop writing down prices, the employees asked him to leave. Mosher refused this option as well and was placed under arrest for trespassing. The criminal charges were eventually dismissed, but Mosher sued Hudson, arguing that he had an irrevocable license to be in the store and thus was not a trespasser. The trial court dismissed Mosher’s complaint. The court of appeals affirmed. Mosher appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Hofstetter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.