Mosher v. Van Buskirk
New Jersey Court of Chancery
144 A. 446 (1929)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
William Mosher died intestate. Mosher’s three tracts of land passed to his heirs-at-law, his adult children and two infant grandchildren. One of the adult heirs filed a partition petition. The adult heirs agreed that Elizabeth Van Buskirk (defendant), one of the heirs, would purchase the property at the partition sale, hold it in trust for the adult heirs, and resell it at a better price through a private sale. The adult heirs’ goal was to exclude the infant grandchildren from an interest in the property. Van Burskirk purchased the property according to the plan for $5,000. Van Buskirk then sold two of the three tracts to the Herbert Investment Company (defendant) for $15,000. Herbert then sold its contract for $20,000. One of the adult heirs (plaintiff) had second thoughts about the plan and filed suit seeking a constructive trust in favor of all of the heirs, including the infant grandchildren. Herbert filed a counterclaim seeking to enforce its purchase contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Backes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.