Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Moss v. INS

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
651 F.2d 1091 (5th Cir. 1981)


Facts

Juanita de los Santos Moss (petitioner) was a citizen of the Philippines. Moss was admitted into the U.S. under a “K visa” as a nonimmigrant alien fiancée of a United States citizen, as provided by § 101(a)(15)(K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The statute (then § 214(d)) provided that a petition for a fiancée shall be approved only if the petitioners show that they have a bona fide intention to marry and are able and willing to marry in the United States within three months (90 days) of entry. Moss and her fiancé lived together for a year in the Philippines and it was undisputed that they intended to marry in the United States. Moss finally married her fiancé 92 days after her entry into the United States. They had a child, however, two months before the birth, Moss’ husband abandoned her. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued an order to show cause to establish Moss’ deportability. Moss contended that she was not subject to deportation because although she had married 92 days after her entry, she had substantially complied with then § 214(d). The Immigration Judge interpreted the 90-day requirement as a rigid and mandatory time period within which the marriage must occur, and found Moss deportable. The Board of Immigration Appeals upheld the decision of the Immigration Judge. Moss appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Garza, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.