Moss v. INS
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
651 F.2d 1091 (1981)
- Written by Darya Bril, JD
Facts
Juanita de los Santos Moss (petitioner) was a citizen of the Philippines. Moss was admitted into the U.S. under a “K visa” as a nonimmigrant alien fiancée of a United States citizen, as provided by § 101(a)(15)(K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The statute (then § 214(d)) provided that a petition for a fiancée shall be approved only if the petitioners show that they have a bona fide intention to marry and are able and willing to marry in the United States within three months (90 days) of entry. Moss and her fiancé lived together for a year in the Philippines and it was undisputed that they intended to marry in the United States. Moss finally married her fiancé 92 days after her entry into the United States. They had a child, however, two months before the birth, Moss’ husband abandoned her. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued an order to show cause to establish Moss’ deportability. Moss contended that she was not subject to deportation because although she had married 92 days after her entry, she had substantially complied with then § 214(d). The Immigration Judge interpreted the 90-day requirement as a rigid and mandatory time period within which the marriage must occur, and found Moss deportable. The Board of Immigration Appeals upheld the decision of the Immigration Judge. Moss appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garza, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.