Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.

775 F.3d 816 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
775 F.3d 816 (2015)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Motorola Mobility LLC (Motorola) (plaintiff) and its foreign subsidiaries bought liquid-crystal-display (LCD) panels from overseas manufacturers to incorporate into its cellphones. Motorola sued AU Optronics Corp. and other foreign manufacturers (defendants), accusing them of forming a cartel that inflated the prices Motorola paid for panels. But Motorola itself directly purchased only 1 percent of its panels. Foreign subsidiaries purchased the rest, with 42 percent incorporated into phones shipped to Motorola for resale to U.S. customers and 57 percent sold abroad. Motorola’s damages expert testified about amounts subsidiaries overpaid, not amounts Motorola overpaid for fully assembled phones, and Motorola said its claims were not based on purchasing finished phones. The district judge ruled that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA) barred Motorola’s suit with respect to 99 percent of the panels. Motorola appealed, arguing it and its subsidiaries formed essentially one entity, meaning Motorola itself bought the panels and suffered damages. Motorola also argued the panels represented import commerce excluded from FTAIA restrictions. Meanwhile, the Justice Department successfully prosecuted AU Optronics for criminal price-fixing.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership