Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Hodel

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
799 F.2d 1423 (1986)


Facts

The Rock Springs Grazing Association (RSGA) (plaintiff) owned land in an area of Wyoming that included a mixture of federal and private property. Cattle owned by the RSGA and thousands of wild horses roamed the RSGA’s property and adjacent federal property. The Mountain States Legal Foundation (plaintiff) and the RSGA sought a writ of mandamus to compel various federal officials (defendants) to remove the wild horses from the private property. The plaintiffs also sought damages under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution for the uncompensated taking of their property. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that (1) the defendants had disregarded repeated requests to remove the wild horses; (2) the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (Act), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1331-40, prohibited the plaintiffs themselves from removing the horses; and (3) wild-horse grazing was causing property damage by eroding topsoil and reducing the availability of forage and water. The district court granted the plaintiffs’ writ of mandamus, but granted summary judgment for the defendants on the takings issue. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed and remanded the grant of summary judgment, finding that the defendants’ complete and exclusive control over the wild horses made the Act a unique type of wildlife-protection legislation. The Tenth Circuit granted the defendants’ petition for rehearing en banc on the takings issue.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McKay, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Barrett, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.