Mowry v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Company

385 N.W.2d 171, 129 Wis. 2d 496 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mowry v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Company

Wisconsin Supreme Court
385 N.W.2d 171, 129 Wis. 2d 496 (1986)

Facts

Bradley Mowry (plaintiff), a passenger in a car driven by Steven McCarthy, was seriously injured in a car accident. McCarthy’s parents were insured by Badger State Mutual Casualty Company (Badger) (defendant). Badger investigated the accident and determined that McCarthy was probably responsible for the accident and that Mowry’s damages would likely exceed the insurance-policy limits. However, due to open questions about the car’s ownership, Badger believed that coverage might not exist for the accident. Mowry sued McCarthy, McCarthy’s parents, and Badger to recover damages for Mowry’s injuries. Mowry demanded a settlement for the full insurance-policy limits. Badger, having denied coverage for the accident, rejected the settlement demand. At Badger’s request, the trial on liability and damages was delayed until after the issue of insurance coverage was resolved. The jury found that McCarthy’s parents did indeed own the car, thereby establishing that the accident was covered under the insurance policy. A judgment was entered in favor of Mowry against Badger for the full policy limits and against McCarthy for an amount that far exceeded the policy limits. McCarthy assigned to Mowry the right to pursue any claims against Badger that otherwise would have belonged to McCarthy in connection with Badger’s denial of insurance coverage and the failure of Badger to settle the claims against McCarthy within the policy limits when the opportunity to do so existed. Mowry filed suit against Badger, alleging bad faith and breach of contract. Mowry was awarded damages. Badger appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ceci, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership