Mowry v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Company
Wisconsin Supreme Court
385 N.W.2d 171, 129 Wis. 2d 496 (1986)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Bradley Mowry (plaintiff), a passenger in a car driven by Steven McCarthy, was seriously injured in a car accident. McCarthy’s parents were insured by Badger State Mutual Casualty Company (Badger) (defendant). Badger investigated the accident and determined that McCarthy was probably responsible for the accident and that Mowry’s damages would likely exceed the insurance-policy limits. However, due to open questions about the car’s ownership, Badger believed that coverage might not exist for the accident. Mowry sued McCarthy, McCarthy’s parents, and Badger to recover damages for Mowry’s injuries. Mowry demanded a settlement for the full insurance-policy limits. Badger, having denied coverage for the accident, rejected the settlement demand. At Badger’s request, the trial on liability and damages was delayed until after the issue of insurance coverage was resolved. The jury found that McCarthy’s parents did indeed own the car, thereby establishing that the accident was covered under the insurance policy. A judgment was entered in favor of Mowry against Badger for the full policy limits and against McCarthy for an amount that far exceeded the policy limits. McCarthy assigned to Mowry the right to pursue any claims against Badger that otherwise would have belonged to McCarthy in connection with Badger’s denial of insurance coverage and the failure of Badger to settle the claims against McCarthy within the policy limits when the opportunity to do so existed. Mowry filed suit against Badger, alleging bad faith and breach of contract. Mowry was awarded damages. Badger appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ceci, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.