Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
827 F.2d 1058 (1987)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The Hawkins County Board of Education (the board) (defendant) adopted the Holt, Rinehart, and Winston basic reading series (the Holt Series) for students in first through eighth grade. The Holt Series was adopted to further the critical reading skills of students in the school district. Critical reading was designed to enable students to evaluate the material they read, contrast the ideas presented, and understand complex themes and characters. The Holt Series contained stories with various concepts, including mental telepathy, evolution, thought transfer, and magic. Some parents objected to the Holt Series, and those parents’ children were initially allowed to complete alternative assignments. However, the board then eliminated all alternative reading programs and required every student to attend classes using the Holt Series. A group of parents (plaintiffs) sued the board, alleging that the board’s requirement to use the Holt Series infringed the plaintiffs’ free exercise of religion under the First Amendment. The plaintiffs alleged that exposing their children to other forms of religion and views that contradicted the parents’ religion infringed on their free-exercise rights, unless the children were informed by the board that the differing views were incorrect. The district court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and granted a preliminary injunction. The board appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lively, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.